finally get to page 38 and the second chapter. 7 lines to describe the Federal Reserve System, before moving heavy artillery: Zeitgeist. Plot, revelations, cover-ups that grow back and that is the Jews. That's why I was in my head when a bell rang in the first chapter it was considered necessary to specify that the goldsmiths were Jewish and the founder of the Bank of England a Mason. Let's see if we also speak of chemtrails in the cartoons of Barbapapa. Below
episodes and diverse subjects, with no clear line of thought: it then follows the classical scheme of the conspiracy of seigniorage. A great confusion of facts and assumptions to lose the thread and accepted as good conclusions that have nothing to do. Simply put, this is the famous "Chewbacca defense . In particular meanings are altered (independence interplay between the ECB and the governing bodies of the EU is described as a mastery of the situation on the first second) and presented data without explicit (what does this mean and how is it measured as a percentage of the political independence of central banks?).
brushes numbers from wikipedia, the shares of the ECB, the Bank of Italy and a little 'number of articles of the law, who always make a good impression. Until a court case emblematic of Minnesota in which a lawyer was able to win the case that the bank had done so because he did not pay the mortgage, claiming that since there had been no physical movement of money, the loan and 'mortgage could not be considered valid. Apart recalled again the Chewbacca defense, it's very strange to learn a kind of news related to a country where legal precedents have legal force in future rulings. How is it possible that an individual has failed to win a similar case in these precise terms and have not done it all? Do not pay the mortgage and when you sue for seized the house, slammed in the face before and you're sure you do not have to make money. Perhaps no one knew? Maybe that Distefano found this case in point unknown even to U.S. lawyers? Mah ..
But here finally jump off the nonsense for excellence. Forty-six pages to the final proof of ignorance in accounting: the budget. It is as absurd then support a thesis with evidence to the contrary, or rather, as we will be able to shuffle the cards in order to be able to say that two plus two equals nine (I have already spoken of Chewbacca defense?).
notes, as mentioned above, are a way of recording a credit bank debt. All debts must be included in liabilities bills, loans, bonds. Even the notes issued. An asset should be added to all activities: real estate, other receivables, cash or securities. The total assets minus total liabilities gives the net. So the higher the liabilities and the lower is the capital. The greater the activity and the higher net worth. If the central bank put in the work (the left column of the balance sheet) and simultaneously also the notes issued licenses obtained from the State in return, would increase the equity, creating a serious inaccuracy mica laugh. When drawing up of € 1,000,000 by increasing the activity of 1,000,000 to 1,000,000 and banknotes issued by the securities received, a total of 2,000,000 euro more as an asset, liability unchanged, the difference gives a net worth increased by 2,000,000 euro without actually changed the bank's assets. As can therefore be argued that placing the liabilities of the banknotes in circulation will increase the equity? Simple: having no idea what you are saying. Seriously. It is very simple, just read a few pages of a book by accounting for more than a third of it or banking, merchant or commercial.
To the question of interest should be paid to those who borrow money from the bank and not vice versa, since the note is a debt of the bank, the only response to that would sometimes watch TV is a good alternative to generate idiot. The bill is a credit to its possessor has against the central bank. Since it is payable at sight, there is no interest, interest related to the unavailability of immediate cash by the creditor, that in this case does not arise. The moment a person asks for a loan from the bank, the bank is "free" availability of credit to give to the individual, who will pay the interest for having a ready availability of credit against a deferred availability. Hard to explain, not to understand, really. If you lend money at interest to Pippo Pluto making a promissory note in sight of 100 €, Goofy has issued a credit for Pluto, who can use it by turning it to Donald to buy something they need. After a year Pippo Pluto will return to the € 100 plus interest, and rightly so, because when Donald found himself in the hand Pippo bill went to his house to collect immediately. Yet at the end of Pluto has paid interest on a loan that has manifested itself with the drafting of a credit instrument that refers to it as a creditor of Goofy. But the strangest thing is that a duck, an arm is an idiot have figured out how it works, while the economy may still have some doubts.
followed various amenities such as questions that arose from the more vulgar ignorance of what I mean, until you get to talk about the wickedness of the banks may decide that the discount rate. Nothing to do with one stone with seigniorage, but that does not matter. Everything is good just to say that the bank is bad. Pointing out that has nothing to do means only defend the bank (also seen in the anonymous comments to blogs of the "debunkers" who reported the news of this degree). Maybe it means to be of disinformation hired (in this regard I would urge all readers, conspiracy or not, do a little experiment and look at the books they have. Discarding the fiction books, test to see if they have more books on physics, chemistry, mathematics, accounting, the valuation, or if they have more books on astrology, ufology, conspiracy, religion, superstition).
So let us not argue with his head. To the credit does not apply the law of supply and demand: is the central bank decides, depending on how you wake up in the morning discount rate. The bank apparently, according to some people, to take advantage of money and credit in their vaults. Does not lower rates when it sees that the score is too exorbitant asking for money and is willing to deny goods and services rather than a debt. No, no, no. Besides, what interest the bank may have to give away all the credit he can? Better surely to keep the funds that pay to rot with a lower profit margin.
Over 3 pages of the International Monetary Fund. We're only on page 50, we must fill with something. Know we can not repeat the same pages of quotes before. But what to do with seigniorage? Nothing, it inserts the anti-globalization criticism of the theory plot and is always good to throw a lot of irons in the fire and mix more discontented possible. Longer hold on the population. Evidently the writer of this thesis copiaincollato all rubbish found on sites that conspiracy theorists who consulted for his illuminating research, without stopping to ask if he really had a bearing on the subject of the thesis. Oh, boys, it has nevertheless Svang five more pages to speak and criticize the IMF, about 6% of the entire work (even if you put into the Zone diet, we could fill three pages and others had the same relevance).
And so, to fill casual: the liberty dollar, some graphics thrown at random and include Blondet. We arrived at page sixty? Yes? Phew, that struggles to fill a claim for 110 cum laude. We conclude this second chapter with some other proposed anti-globalization and passed to the next, just a couple of pages, in which we suggest as a solution to all ills good buys at the supermarket.
We are in chapter 3, right? We can finally talk about the Jews? We're talking about conspiracy and we have just mentioned, in short, we also devote an entire chapter, otherwise we have to fall back on reptilian. And they keep them there for the degree. In addition, two menate to tell the story of its monetary system, the shekel and the dollar and euro prices up there like nothing SBAFO 5 short pages, we considered that to make the mass even the spaces before and after each punctuation mark (check for yourself).
History of Israeli banks, their privatization, brief mention of the fact that the seignorage starts because there is fractional reserve banking. What exactly is the line of reasoning behind it all is unclear, but we also got to put the space between the figures and comma in numbers (giuro!), so I think we're really going to try to close as soon as possible. The seventy pages, we go, we're almost there. Sbattiamoci something inside of the anti-globalization and environmentalist, do a Kibbutz Samar? But yes, let's get this community that rejects the typical Western consumerism and competition. On the forms of alternative energy and agriculture! We can go
conclusions? Come on. Then: the banks are bad, there is too much debt not covered, governments are bad, the Western countries exploit the third world countries, becomes the war for oil, no longer exist between seasons and my cousin from a child Once he is dead. The solution is peace in the world or, alternatively, that instead of producing currency in the form of the debt is to be produced as a form of credit. Anything that can mean.
Following the bibliography, with titles such as folk "or the bank or your life", "Bankestein", "The bank, money and wear", "History of Monetary Crimes," "Euroslaves" "Confessions of an Economic Hit Man" and "Wars of oil." Hits like a punch in the eye of this title "Capital" of Marx. It is not surprising, however, the total lack of titles that deal with "accounting" or "banking". There are also internet sources, which include the websites of the aforementioned banks, La Repubblica, Il Sole 24 Ore and gems like wikipedia, and disinformazione.it csm.it (Monetary Studies Centre).
concludes this thesis with great thanks. First the teacher who allowed her to present this incredible shit like theses. Even I would have thanked. Thanks also to Marco Saba, one of the study center on money, the same man who has spammed everywhere the news of the degree of Maruska as a victory of the struggle to seigniorage, the one that has often been used as a source. Like to thank the landlord for having said that his wine is good. (No, do not expect that fool thanks personal / affective making observations sull'omeopata veterinarian)
I take up my thesis. The praise the 110 and I missed a dozen votes. The pages are 10 cheaper, true, but I can not find shit, assumptions spans air, copy and paste and vulgar attempts to lengthen the stock and I had to work for 3 months on a project before you can write. But maybe I was wrong to choose a university with almost 8 centuries of history, I choose one with less than 10 years.
