Democracy I was going to make a vitriolic post to talk about the new comic idol of contrails, the new phenomenon "feissbukkiano", what would shoot down the planes with bazzuca (you write bazooka.'s note). But really I think I do better to spend less virtual space as possible. I'm sure someone could use it better, would also use it to share a documentary on the growth of mold.
are sour, I know, but when you scrape off the bottom of the barrel to get a bit 'of fame, I turn the so-called. Then, when the reputation needed to pick up some votes, then if I bring my dark underwear can be exchanged for one of the famous helicopter blacks.
The character in question (forgive me if I quote him, but also avoids naming him), he founded a group in Facebook, now made famous by many other blogs, including Perle. This group would not nothing more than other groups in the popular social network useless, except perhaps a large number of followers (whose majority is composed of those who "accepted" all to have lived a bulletin board) and the apparent genesis as a "trap-attracting suckers" .
But maybe it's best we do a brief history of its evolution to better understand.
The group was founded with a title quite anonymous "chemtrails exist." Nothing special. At some point, however, adds to the trails the word "toxic." This choice apparently serves only to provoke laughter and is justified by saying that it is essential that you know that chemtrails are composed of toxic substances. Any other theory is basically a nonsense and will not find place in the group. A more mischievous
eye could see that it is only increased the visibility of the group (search for "toxic chemicals", for example, puts it among the top search results despite the argument was addressed to anything).
He was later also added "and could cause serious illness", probably with the same purpose. To thank the admin has set "CAUSE" with security, as suggested to him by members of his group, perhaps to avoid "take him out."
The spread of the group is encouraged to contact the members via spam, every day, so become the largest group.
So, to gain visibility into the group adopts the most squalid web techniques from being indexed in searches that have little to do with spam to the wild. Pathetic.
But beyond to get people to the group, you have to convince them to stay. How? With the arguments? Present ideas?
No, adapted as possible to those who pass. In the beginning was categorical group seriously, no bullshit alternatives. Chemtrails are releases of toxic substances, everything else is hot air. For a while 'also tries to maintain that order, urges people not to mention other theories why you should not put too many irons in the fire or simply because the "people" is not able to understand and be informed a little at a time. In short, the usual script.
But that order is lost in a hurry, despite the censors that there are methods, including cancellations and ban members "uncomfortable." Are beginning to embrace the various alternative theories / conspiracy to make everyone happy. From the findings kept secret by the medical establishment, to allegations about HAARP. In short, the usual script.
becomes interesting when it comes to Tanker Enemy and sciechimiche.org. Indeed it is difficult to bring together the two "streams": the ones losing sciechimiche or the followers of the master? Tough choice, our hero chooses to mumble incoherent advice: believe sciechimiche? Yes, no, almost: it is an owl site.
In all this development will not miss all the usual circus of crap: insults and criticisms of debunkers (destronzer become), a collection of photos of trails for the production of a book on the disclosure of which group members can make money, threats and incitement to violence (the famous bazzuca to shoot down airliners).
But its high profile in what is it? I do not know for sure, but the fact that our candidate is in a civic list makes me suspect strongly that you are scraping the bottom of the barrel to pick up the votes of the conspiracy.
would not be the first time, prominent politicians have questioned the parliament, only to be noticed, without even look at the response received.
And the party that says? Surely they are aware of. Evidently they do not depart from the behavior of their affiliates and why they disagree and argue.
But they have the right: this is democracy. Or rather, is democracy as we understand them, insult, accuse and misinform. Democracy thus becomes the freedom to exercise their stupidity and impose it on others.
starting to think that when someone speaks of democracy, believes that "demo" comes directly from "dementia" ...
ps I knew: I apologize to the fans of molds for wasting space.
